Because the last section is so short, I think that we can combine our discussion of the two.
In this reading, I found the selection by Joyce Hope Scott to be discussion worthy. As you may recall, she recounts the language and history of Ocala, Florida...a Bilingual, Bicultural Community within a Segregated Southern America.
What I found to be so interesting is the emphasis that is placed within the community on Standard English. When the community gathers for a BBQ, Ebonics is heard everywhere; yet, outside of that people are almost expected to speak Standard English. I find this to be a bizarre dynamic. What messages have permeated this community. I wonder why the community does not fight for its bilingual nature, why more power is not attributed to the language of Ebonics.
I found this discussion, this debate, to we empowering and certainly interesting, yet, I feel as though excuses are constantly made. The book explains in detail how Ebonics is truly its own language, yet in the documentation of the Ebonics decision, the wording was changed to devalue Ebonics.
I understand that this fight is being taken step by step, and certainly the debate itself is an enormous gain. Yet, I think that it is important to stay true to its power. This is a mild rant, yet I see those fighting on the behalf of Ebonics, allowing themselves to devalue Ebonics and it does not leave a good taste. Maybe you all feel differently, thoughts?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-2.gif)
Hey Matt. I agree with most of what you have to say, but I do not feel the same on the last point you made. I don't see them "devaluing" Ebonics as much as keeping it in discussion. What it comes down to is helping the students achieve success and I think that's the realization that the proponents of the bill had. Do you refuse to change the wording on the bill and continue to hinder student progress, or do what it takes to get the resolution passed. I get the point of being strong and representing your culture or your heritage in the face of oppression, but I think it is a stronger stance to value the students' education even if it means others might see it as weakness or giving in.
ReplyDelete